Legal Opinion
Luxenberg v. Marshall
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided June 10, 1992No. 05-92-00517-CVPublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAPLAN, Justice.
This mandamus proceeding involves the imposition of “death penalty” sanctions for making a false verification and other abuses of the trial process. We deny the writ.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
1, Underlying Lawsuit
Windsor Communications, Inc. 1 sued William Windsor and Barbara Windsor for misuse of company funds, conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent misrepresentation, and slander. The original petition contained an application for temporary restraining order and temporary injunction alleging that William Windsor committed various acts detrimental to the company.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Save Our Springs Alliance, Inc. v. Lazy Nine Municipal Utility District Ex Rel. Board of Directors, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- Hawthorne v. Guenther, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
- In Re H&R Block Financial Advisors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Vinson v. Texas Commerce Bank-Houston, National Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- In Re Acceptance Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.