Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hussein v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2012Published

1Concurrence

Ciparick, J. (concurring).

I fully agree with the majority’s holding that plaintiffs’ claims are neither moot nor unripe. I *901write separately to emphasize that Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York (86 NY2d 307 [1995] [CFE IJ) is, and should remain, good law and that the parameters we set forth in that case and in CFE II (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 100 NY2d 893 [2003]) to define the content of a constitutionally-required “sound basic education” do not intrude into the policy-making functions of the other branches of government but rather constitute a proper…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Board of Education v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Claremont School District v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API