Legal Opinion

League v. Citibank (South Dakota)

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 19, 2008No. A08A0601PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Appearing pro se, Joseph League appeals from a grant of summary judgment to Citibank (South Dakota) concerning his indebtedness under a credit card agreement. League argues that he should be released from paying the debt on account of Citibank’s failure to respond to his written notice of its alleged acceptance of League’s “signed note(s) or other similar instrument(s)” in satisfaction of the debt. We disagree and affirm.

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”1 A trial court’s grant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Brannen/Goddard Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Walker v. Gwinnett Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Ethridge v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Weldon v. DEL TACO CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Simon v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Melman v. FIA Card Services, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Thomason v. Fia Card Services, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  3. Rutledge v. Gemini Capital Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. Board of Trustees of Georgia Military College v. Rose O'DonnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  5. Daniel J. Rutledge v. Gemini Capital Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API