Legal Opinion
The Red Wing
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 19, 1925No. 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, District Judge.
The briefs filed herein contain nothing that operates to modify the views of the court as expressed from the bench at the conclusion of the evidence. The cases cited in the brief of proctor for libelant are not analogous to this ease. The Emma B (D. C.) 140 F. 771, and Metropolitan S. S. Co. v. Pacific-Alaska Navigation Co. (D. C.) 260 F. 973, do hot concern partnerships, but relate to disputes between co-owners or part owners of vessels.
Here, however, the dispute arises between partners owning unequal interests in the ship Red Wing, and the main questions are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The Steamboat Orleans v. PhœbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Eber B. Ward, Survivor, &C., Owner of the Steamboat Detroit v. Charles ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- The Emma BDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1906
- Coyne v. CaplesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1881
- Metropolitan S. S. Co. v. Pacific-Alaska Nav. Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1919
3Cited by5 opinions
- Madruga v. Superior Court of Cal., County of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- W. E. Hedger Transp. Corp. v. Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Garcia v. GarciaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Madruga v. Superior Court of Cal., County of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- W. E. Hedger Transp. Corp. v. Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946