Legal Opinion

State v. Dumas

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2011No. 10 MA 61PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Dumas,

2011-Ohio-3402.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, ) ) CASE NO. 10 MA 61 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, ) ) - VS - ) OPINION ) NATHANIAL DUMAS, ) ) DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. ) CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Criminal Appeal from Youngstown Municipal Court, Case No. 09TRD3639. JUDGMENT: Affirmed. APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff-Appellee: No Brief Filed. For Defendant-Appellant: Attorney James E. Lanzo Attorney Pete C. Klimis 4126 Youngstown-Poland Road Youngstown, OH 44514 JUDGES: Hon. Mary DeGenaro Hon. Cheryl L. Waite Hon. Joseph J. Vukovich…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State ex rel. Lemmon v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. Reynolds, 08-Je-9 (2-26-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. KestersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TorresOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API