Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hernando HMA, LLC v. Erwin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 3, 2017No. Case 5D16-2835Published

1DissentCohen, J.

The panel agrees that the trial court relied on the incorrect legal standard in granting Respondent’s motion to amend the complaint to add a claim for punitive damages. Our disagreement is whether Petitioner preserved that issue for appellate review. I would hold that Petitioner preserved the issue and grant the petition.

In granting Respondent’s motion to amend, the trial court relied on this Court’s opinion in Estate of Despain v. Avante Group, Inc., 900 So.2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), which, pursuant to section 768.72, Florida Statutes (1999), allowed a plaintiff to establish the vicarious…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mercury Motors Exp., Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Estate of Despain v. Avante Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. HCA Health Services of Florida, Inc., d/b/a St. Lucie Medical Center v. Sarah Byers-McPheeters Bryan McPhetters Michael Anthony Meloni, Jr., M.D. J.H. Gatewood Emergency Services, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API