Legal Opinion

Fruit Growers Express Co. v. Brett

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1933No. 7,042PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The attorney general has appealed, on behalf of the state treasurer, from a judgment entered on the pleadings in an action instituted by the Fruit Growers Express Company, a Delaware corporation, against F. E. Williams, treasurer of the state of Montana, for the recovery of certain taxes paid under protest. On the hearing before this court James J. Brett, the present state treasurer, was substituted for F. E. Williams, retired. The pleadings consist of the complaint and answer.

A. By paragraphs 1 to 5, inclusive, the complaint alleges the following facts: The plaintiff is a “Freight Line…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Philadelphia & Southern Steamship Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. United States Express Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Fargo v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Union Tank Line Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Victor Chemical Works v. Silver Bow CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. North American Car Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Victor Chemical Works v. Silver Bow CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API