Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of Cleveland

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1971No. 20706Published

1ConcurrenceMcCREE, Circuit Judge

I wish to add a few words of concurrence to Chief Judge Phillips’ opinion. Our court adopted the “locality-plus” test of maritime jurisdiction in Chapman v. City of Grosse Pointe Farms, 385 F.2d 962 (6th Cir. 1967), and Wiper v. Great Lakes Engineering Works, 340 F.2d 727 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812, 86 S.Ct. 28, 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965), but I agree with Judge Phillips that the difference between that test and the “locality-alone” test is not involved in the decision of this case. The crucial question here — on which I read Judge Phillips and Judge Edwards to take opposite views…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charles A. Chapman, Libelant-Appellant v. City of Grosse Pointe Farms, a Michigan Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  2. Wiper v. Great Lakes Engineering WorksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  3. Weinstein v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API