Legal Opinion

McCully v. Swackhamer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Union County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Prim, C. J.:

This is an action commenced by appellant against respondent to recover the possession of two horses, one set of harness and a wagon. The complaint contains the usual allegations of fact in such actions, and are sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The answer undertakes to justify the taking and detention of the property in question by alleging that it was levied upon and sold as the property of John W. McCully, by virtue of an execution duly issued against him and placed in the hands of respondent as sheriff of Union county. The allegations of the answer were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moore v. FloydOregon Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marks v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API