Latiolais v. Emile Barras, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JiSAUNDERS, Judge.
In this workers’ compensation proceeding, defendants balk at claimant’s request that it pay for two cardiovascular operations, contending that claimant failed to make his case under the stringent requirements of LSA-R.S. 23:1021(7)(e), pertaining to heart-related or perivascular injuries. The hearing officer concluded that the provision is not applicable and held the employer and its insurer responsible for claimant’s medical expenses, finding that these expenses were caused not by the accident itself, but resulted from complications from claimant’s medically necessary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Virgil v. American Guar. & Liability Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Charles v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- White v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Andrus v. Great American Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Gioe v. Albach Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006