Legal Opinion

Crisler v. Bank of Canton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1938No. 27046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) If the plaintiff fails to make out a prima facie case, or if, admitting all the facts proved and all reasonable deductions from them, the plaintiff ought not to recover, a nonsuit shall be granted. Code, § 110-310; Evans v. Josephine Mills, 119 Ga. 448 (2) (46 S. E. 674); Walker v. Georgia Railway and Electric Co., 122 Ga. 368 (50 S. E. 121); Flippin v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 35 Ga. App. 243 (3) (132 S. E. 918). The court properly granted a nonsuit. With reference to the renewal and acceptance of the $10,000 note by the bank, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Evans v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Hoke v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Strachan Shipping Co. v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Strange v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. West v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henson v. Columbus Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Henson v. Columbus Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API