Legal Opinion

Rosenkrantz v. Berlin

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSol Wachtler, J.

These two motions are brought in an action for damages for violation of section 489 of the Judiciary Law. The plaintiff, in the first cause of action, claims that the defendants, Salvo Realty Corp. and Berlin, purchased by assignment a mortgage and note, then in foreclosure, on property owned by such plaintiff for the sole purpose of foreclosing the mortgage. The second cause of action involves the defendants Berlin and Landau Investors Corporation and alleges that these defendants took an assignment of a judgment for the sole purpose of causing the Sheriff to execute on it. The third cause…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wetmore v. . HegemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Warner v. PaineNew York Court of Chancery · 1847

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sygma Photo News, Inc. v. Globe International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Ehrlich v. Rebco Insurance Exchange, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. First National Bank v. FelderSuffolk County District Court · 1972
  4. Fahrenholz v. Security Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API