Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Aitcheson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1887PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Tuscola. (Beach, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts-are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

This is an action of assumpsit, brought by plaintiff against the defendant to recover back money paid on a contract for the sale of land.

The defendant sold by contract to the plaintiff 40 acres of land, lying in the township of Novesta, in the county of Tuscola, for the sum of $400, to be paid as follows: $30 on the execution of the contract; $100 on the first day of February, 1885; $100 February 1, 1886; $100 February 1, 1887; and $50 August 1, 1887. The first two payments were made according to the conditions of the contract.

On the twenty-sixth day of January, 1885, without the knowledge or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Cook v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Hornbeck v. Midwest Realty, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Kreibich v. MartzMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. In Re Reason's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Johnson v. OlbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API