Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Steinberg-Kass, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mandamus does not lie in behalf of a former stockholder and officer of a corporation for the inspection of its books. The common-law and statutory right of inspection depends on the subsisting status of stockholder or officer in respect to the corporation. The petition fails to allege that petitioner presently is a stockholder or officer of the corporate respondent; hence, it is legally insufficient. We do not pass on the respondents’ contractual rights under the agreements of the parties dated October 21, 1954 and March 29, 1957. The order unanimously reversed on the law and the petition…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Orenstein v. Snow Becker Krauss P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Orenstein v. Snow Becker Krauss P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API