Legal Opinion

Robb v. New York & Cleveland Gas Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1907No. Appeal, No. 65PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 65, Oct. T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Aug. T., 1904, No. 729, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Mary M. Robb v. New York and Cleveland Gas Coal Co. Trespass to recover damages for the alleged wrongful mining of coal. At the trial the jury returned a verdict of $5,250, being treble the value of the coal taken.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 65, Oct. T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Aug. T., 1904, No. 729, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Mary M. Robb v. New York and Cleveland Gas Coal Co. Trespass to recover damages for the alleged wrongful mining of coal. At the trial the jury returned a verdict of $5,250, being treble the value of the coal taken. On a motion for judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto McClung, J., filed the following opinion: Mary Robb, the plaintiff, sues to recover damages for the mining of coal by the defendant under her farm in Penn and Wilkins…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judges who heard this case being equally divided in opinion the judgment is affirmed.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brolasky's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Playa De Flor Land & Improvement Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, Canal Zone · 1945
  3. Robinson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Stephens v. DoxeyUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  5. New York & Cleveland Gas Coal Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API