Legal Opinion

Van Hobbs v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1990No. B14-90-560-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

This is an appeal challenging the denial of appellant’s writ of habeas corpus. In one point of error, appellant argues that the evidence adduced at the hearing on the writ was insufficient to establish that he was the same person named in a governor’s warrant issued by the State of Virginia. We affirm.

Appellant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the district court seeking relief from a governor’s warrant demanding his extradition to Virginia to answer to the felony charge of bigamy. Following a hearing on the matter, the trial court denied the writ. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MartinezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Ex Parte ScarbroughCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Ex Parte NelsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Ex Parte ClubbCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Ex Parte BunchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex parte SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Ex Parte Oscar Edgardo Guillen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  3. Ex Parte: Clyde Miller Wallace, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API