Legal Opinion

Estes v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 5, 1910No. 6027Published

Error to Mesa District Court — Hon. Theron Stevens, Judge.

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

2Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

Counsel for appellee have filed a petition for rehearing based solely upon the ground that we erred in holding that the testimony of the witness with respect to market prices was admissible. In support of this contention, Willard v. Mellor, 19 Colo. 534, is *392cited. Our attention was not called to this case in either the original briefs, or on oral argument. In that case it was held that circulars sent out from day to day by merchants dealing in a certain commodity purporting to give the market price of such commodity upon the day of issuance, it not appearing' that…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Smith v. N. C. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  3. Whitney v. ThacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. Willard v. MellorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API