Legal Opinion
Salvador v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 3, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mikoll, J. P.
The thrust of this litigation is primarily a challenge to certain laws (L 1979, ch 599; L 1987, ch 617) and regulations (6 NYCRR parts 645, 646) promulgated to implement the regulatory authority of respondent Lake George Park Commission (hereinafter the Commission) over vessels, wharfs, moorings and fee schedules set forth in ECL 43-0125, as well as the Commission’s wastewater (6 NYCRR subpart 646-3) and stormwater (6 NYCRR subpart 646-4) authority conferred by ECL 43-0110 and 43-0112. Since 1973, petitioners have owned, operated and resided at Dunham’s Bay…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Sperry Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Adler v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Hotel Dorset Co. v. Trust for Cultural ResourcesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Wambat Realty Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Kelley v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lake George Park Commission v. SalvadorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Schulz v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Blanchfield v. Town of HoosickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Lake George Park Commission v. SalvadorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Blanchfield v. Town of HoosickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017