Legal Opinion

Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Invamed Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 23, 2000No. 99-1466PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

As part of a settlement of a patent infringement case, the plaintiffs dismissed their complaint. A defendant then moved the district court (1) to impose sanctions for the plaintiffs’ alleged violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by filing a baseless suit without a proper investigation and (2) to determine under 35 U.S.C. § 285 that the case was “exceptional” and to award the defendant attorney fees. The defendant also contended that *1361the plaintiffs’ in-house counsel had violated a state rule .of professional conduct by-discussing and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. LKB Produkter ABCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  4. Cambridge Products, Ltd., and Naremco, Inc. v. Penn Nutrients, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. Rohm and Haas Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Brotech CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Richard Ruiz and Foundation Anchoring Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross v. A.B. Chance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Brasseler, U.S.A. I, L.P. v. Stryker Sales Corporation and Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. Forest Laboratories, Inc. And Ony, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, and Tokyo Tanabe Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  4. Superior Fireplace Company v. The Majestic Products Company and Vermont Castings, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Glaxo Group Limited and Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API