Legal Opinion
Burdick v. Marcus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 11, 2005PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated August 13, 2004, as granted the plaintiffs motion to “restore” the action to the calendar and denied that branch of his cross motion which was to dismiss the action.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion to “restore” this action to the calendar after it had been marked inactive due to the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- 123X Corp. v. McKenzieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Torres v. Nu-Way Machinery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Gendus v. Sheraton / Atlantic City WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Lucious v. Rutland Nursing HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by12 opinions
- Andre v. Bonetto Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Mitskevitch v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Suburban Restoration Co. v. ViglottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Varricchio v. SterlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Casavecchia v. MizrahiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.