Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Bell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 18, 1929No. 18525PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY, C.

Eva H. Bell prayed for a writ of mandamus to compel the. city of Tulsa, its proper officers and agents, to issue her a permit to connect, certain residence properties with a district' sanitary sewer in said city. The trial court issued the writ, and the defendants have appealed. Plaintiff owned the west 160 feet of lots 4 and 6, Clarence Lloyd subdivision in the city of Tulsa. These two lots lie together, and are 160 feet east and west and about 234 feet north and south. All property for a considerable distance in every direction from plaintiff’s property was within the corporate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kilcullen v. WebsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. City of Fergus Falls v. BoenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. City of Fergus Falls v. EdisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Exchange National Co. v. City of GarberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API