Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Lummis
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice.
The threshold questions in this action to enforce the terms of a promissory note are whether the probate court of Harris County had in personam jurisdiction of the debtor, a Nevada corporation with offices in New York and authority to do business in California as well, and if so, did it have subject matter jurisdiction? We hold that the court had both, that it decided other questions involved in the judgment correctly, and thus we affirm.
On July 2,1965, Howard Hughes granted to Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. the exclusive right to publish his biography or otherwise to exploit his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mary Jean Prejean v. Sonatrach, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Texas Commerce Bank National Ass'n v. Interpol '80 Ltd. Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
- Pullen v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Lee v. McCormick, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1983
- Potkovick v. Regional Ventures, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.