Legal Opinion
United States v. Armon
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided July 21, 1999No. 98-0388/ARPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge GIERKE
delivered the opinion of the Court.
A general court-martial composed of officer members convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of 3 specifications of making false official statements and 4 specifications of wrongfully wearing unauthorized military accouterments, in violation of Articles 107 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 907 and 934, respectively. The offenses arose when appellant wore a Special Forces tab; a Special Forces combat patch, signifying that he had served with a Special Forces unit in a combat zone; the Combat Infantryman’s Badge (CIB); and a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. ClaxtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. HornerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. AurichUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. CatrettCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. KeyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. Sergeant First Class ALAN D. ESLINGERArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010
- United States v. BishUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. CatrettCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.