Legal Opinion

De Beque Producers Ass'n v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 3, 1928No. 11,977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

May was awarded compensation-by the commission and the district" court-affirmed the award. The association brings error. The principal question is, was May an employee of the association?

The commission found ‘ ‘ That the claimant herein was engaged with one Edwards in operating a threshing machine for the De Beque Producers Association. The two men were paid' a percentage of the money received from the operation of the machine. Payments for the work done were made direct to the company and the men were paid by the company.”

“The commission finds that the claimant was an employee as defined by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. HammondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Industrial Commission v. BonfilsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Industrial Commission v. Continental Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Index Mines Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Arnold v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Employers' Mutual Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  2. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API