Legal Opinion
Osterink v. Moon
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 30, 1983No. 82-2209PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Finding support in the record for the trial court’s ruling that no contract existed between the parties, we affirm that decision. We also affirm the trial court’s requirement of the return to the purchaser of his deposit money, plus expenses, and the denial of interest and attorney’s fees. We find no error in the trial court’s ruling that Hixon was not bound by the trust agreement.
AFFIRMED.
RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Masters v. MastersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983