Legal Opinion

Fish v. Smith

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1998No. 23577PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a discretionary costs case. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying discretionary costs.

I

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Jennifer Fish (Jennifer), a minor, was a passenger on a school bus that was rear-ended by a vehicle assigned to the Department of Health and Welfare, which in turn had been rear-ended by a truck owned by K.J. Weller, Inc. (Weller) and driven by Albert Ronald Smith (Smith). Jennifer and her parents (collectively referred to as Fish) sued both Weller and Smith (the defendants) for injuries Jennifer allegedly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Roe Ex Rel. Roe v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Perry v. Magic Valley Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Great Plains Equipment, Inc. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hayden Lake Fire Protection District v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. City of McCall v. SeubertIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Bailey v. SanfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API