Legal Opinion

Scheinblum v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtHenry J. Latham, J.

Motion by defendant for a change of venue of this action from Kings County to Queens County.

No claim is made that an impartial trial cannot be had in Kings County. Neither is the application founded on any claim that the convenience of material witnesses or the ends of justice, will be promoted by the change. The sole ground urged on this application is that Queens County is the proper county for the trial of this action. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 187.)

Plaintiff is a resident of Kings County. Defendant has its principal place of business in Queens County. While the largest portion of defendant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. RooseveltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Johnston v. MacFadden Newspapers Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Alexander v. Brooklyn Eagle, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API