Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 2009No. 4D08-4111PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the order denying appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.800(a) motion without prejudice for appellant to raise his claim in a properly sworn and legally sufficient rule 3.850 motion if appellant has not already filed such a motion. Appellant has not demonstrated that his claim that a prior grand theft conviction should not have been included on his scoresheet can be determined from the face of the record. Tyson v. State, 852 So.2d 428 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (explaining that generally a claim of this type may not be raised in a rule 3.800(a) motion because it requires an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Tyson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nettles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API