Legal Opinion

Mulinix v. Davenport Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1917No. 7766PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint; from city court of Cartersville—Judge Moon. July 10, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.

1. Documentary evidence set out in the pleadings or attached thereto as exhibits should no't be included in the brief of evidence otherwise than by reference thereto. Civil Code of 1910, § 6093; Oconee Oil Co. v. Planters Oil Co., 6 Ga. App. 413 (65 S. E. 144); Slappey v. Charles, 7 Ga. App. 796 (68 S. E. 308).

2. As all the grounds of the exceptions to the judgment rendered by the trial judge (sitting by consent without the intervention of a jury) depend upon a consideration of the evidence, and as what purports to be a brief of the evidence, both oral and documentary, contained in the bill…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. City of CairoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Ingram v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Mewborn v. WeitzerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Slappey v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Oconee Oil Refining Co. v. Planters Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Securities Trust Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API