Legal Opinion
Railroad Commission v. Mackhank Petroleum Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 3, 1945No. 9469; Motion No. 10139PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McClendon, chief justice.
Oil proration case. The suit was by MPCo. (Mackhank Petroleum Company) against the Commission (Railroad Commission of Texas) to set aside an order of the Commission dated March 17, 1944, prorating for the month of April, 1944 (by amendment a like order for May, 1944, was added), the allowable allocated to the New Refugio Field in Refugio County. The proration was upon a per well basis of 57 barrels per day per well, with seven shut down days per month, but allocating to one well (No. 2) of the WRR (W. R. R. Oil Co.) 58 barrels per day, and exempting WRR wells 2 and 3…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marrs v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Railroad Commission v. MarrsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
3Cited by8 opinions
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. RAILROAD COM'N OF TEXASTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Railroad Commission v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Deep South Oil Co. of Texas v. Texas Gas Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Standard Oil Co. of Texas v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Railroad Commission v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.