Legal Opinion · Dissent

Orange County v. Ware

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1991No. C-9611Published

1DissentMauzy, Justice

There once was a time when this state’s constitution protected debtors from garnishment of wages. The command of article 16, section 28 was clear — “No current wages for personal service shall ever be subject to garnishment” — and its effect was plain and simple: a creditor could not clear its accounts by taking the bread off a worker’s table.

That day is gone. With today’s opinion, the court has effectively abolished one of the most distinctive and important protections of our state constitution. Prom now on, to collect on a bad debt, all a creditor need do is assign the debt to the debtor’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beggs v. FiteTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Stephen C. Crane, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. State of Texas v. County of Dallas, Ben Ellis, John Orvis, Mike Schwille, Berlaind Brashear and Chuck Miller, Defendants-Appellants-Cross v. Henry Wade and L. E. MurdochCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Sloan v. DouglassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Benton v. Wilmer-Hutchins Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
  5. Dempsey v. McKennellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API