Legal Opinion

Barbour v. City of Montgomery

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1958No. 3 Div. 17PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

This case comes before us on the three following assignments of error:

“1. The Trial Court erred m overruling appellant’s written motion to suppress the evidence.
“2. The Trial Court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to 'exclude all the testimony of C. J. Maggelet.
“3. The Trial Court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to exclude the prosecution’s (City of Montgomery) on, the ground that it was evidence illegally obtained without a search warrant.”

The appellant here seeks a distinction .between the instant case and that obtaining in Perry v. City of Birmingham, 38 Ala.App.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bales v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Kreulhaus v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Dew v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  4. Thompson v. City of SylacaugaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Ex Parte DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Downey v. City of Bay MinetteAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Gray v. City of MontgomeryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API