Legal Opinion

Dreyfuss & Son v. Benson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1922No. 8623PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; W. P. Whitehurst, Judge. Mandamus by C. L. Benson against Drey-fuss & Son and others. Prom judgment granting application for writ, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

This is an appeal' prosecuted from a judgment of the district court granting appellee’s application for writ of mandamus and directing appellant and its officers to “permit and allow” appellee to examine and inspect the books, records, and papers of appellants at reasonable times during business hours with the aid of such accountants, attorneys, or stenographers as he might select.

The case was submitted to a jury upon two special issues in -connection with a peremptory' instruction that the evidence showed appellee to be a stockholder in the corporation. The special issues submitted a^nd the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Venner v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Bulkley v. Whited & Wheless, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  3. Killough v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  4. Roberts v. MunroeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Watkins v. CassellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. State v. Superior Oil Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1940
  3. Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Guaranty Old Line Life Co. v. McCallumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. City of El Paso v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API