Legal Opinion

City of Frederick v. Elmore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 19, 1978No. 51021Published

1Dissent · IrwinIrwin, Justice

The trial judge did not award medical benefits to claimant and claimant did not appeal to the State Industrial Court en banc. The court en banc awarded the medical benefits notwithstanding claimant’s failure to appeal. Respondent argues that claimant’s right to medical benefits was not properly before the court en banc and it had no authority to award such benefits. To sustain the award the majority opinion relies upon certain language contained in 85 O.S.1971 § 77(9), and the following decisions: Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Hester, 188 Okl. 394, 109 P.2d 820 (1941); Edmonds v. Skelly…

Also in this document: Dissent · Opala.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Woolfolk v. SemrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 281, St. Question No. 441Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. HesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Shelton v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Department of Public Safety v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API