Legal Opinion

Bickford v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 29, 1974No. 6787PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

The major issue of this case is whether the trial court correctly ruled that the two-year suicide clause in a life insurance policy began to run on the date the policy was issued. The plaintiff, as administratrix of her deceased husband’s estate as well as named beneficiary in his life insurance policy, filed an action in both tort and contract to recover proceeds and damages arising out of a coverage dispute under the life insurance policy issued by the defendants to the plaintiff’s husband. A trial without jury resulted in verdicts in favor of the defendants. All questions of law raised by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eichel v. PayeurSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  2. Rivier College v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
  3. Abington Mutual Fire Insurance v. DrewSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  4. Abbott v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  5. Hadler v. Great Eastern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McGilvray v. Farmers New World Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Couture v. Mammoth Groceries Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  3. State v. MerskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Brindis v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. DanielsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API