Legal Opinion

Manning v. Anagnost

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 2013No. COA12-1030PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where plaintiff challenged the credibility of defendant at trial, the trial court did not err in admitting character evidence of defendant’s truthfulness. The trial court did not err in allowing defendant to present the deposition of a witness at trial in the interest of justice. Defendant was not required to tender a treating physician as an expert witness. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in holding that defendant had denied certain allegations contained in plaintiff’s complaint in good faith.

I. Factual and Procedural History

Harold Manning (plaintiff) was married…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Turner v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tetra Tech Tesoro, Inc. v. JAAAT Technical Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Justus v. RosnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. McMillan v. Ryan Jackson Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. Schwarz v. St. Jude Med.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API