Legal Opinion

State Department of Employment v. Blachly

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1994No. 20484PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

1994 OPINION NUMBER 30, ISSUED MARCH 9, 1994, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN AND THIS OPINION IS SUBSTITUTED THEREFORE. PETITION FOR REHEARING DENIED.

2Per curiam

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

■ Nicolette Blachly (“Blachly”), a licensed manicurist, operated the American Beauty Salon (the “Salon”) which was licensed in her name. Four cosmetologists worked at the Salon. On April 27, 1990, a status determination was filed with the Department of Employment (the “Department”) holding that Blachly was liable for unemployment insurance contributions on the four cosmetologists’ wages for the period of July 1, 1986…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kindred v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jensen v. Pillsbury Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lines v. Idaho Forest IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harten Aluminum Co. v. State, Department of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API