Legal Opinion

Bruner v. City of Danville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 22, 1965Published

1Opinion of the Court

394 S.W.2d 939 (1965)

A. G. BRUNER, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF DANVILLE, Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

October 22, 1965.

Cecil C. Sanders, Lancaster, for appellant.

Donald Harkins, Danville, for appellee.

PALMORE, Judge.

This proceeding originated as a mandamus suit in the Boyle Circuit Court. Its purpose was to secure for the appellant, Bruner, a license to conduct public dances in the City of Danville. The only defendants named in the complaint were the mayor and one member of the city's common council. During the course of the litigation it was agreed that the city was the proper…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tolliver v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Village of Des Plaines v. PoyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Lewis v. Board of Councilmen of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  4. Board of Trustees v. BayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. Bruner v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API