Legal Opinion

Bertuli v. Gaull

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 5, 1991No. 3-90-0736PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Haase

The plaintiffs, Mark and Cynthia Bertuli, successfully enforced a restrictive covenant against the defendants, William and Julie Gaull. Subsequent to the entry of the injunction, the plaintiffs brought suit seeking to recover $4,000 in legal fees, court costs, and out-of-pocket expenses they expended in bringing the action. The defendants moved to dismiss. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion and ordered the plaintiffs’ complaint dismissed. The plaintiffs filed a motion to reconsider. The trial court denied the motion to reconsider. The defendants then brought a motion for sanctions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yassin v. Certified Grocers of Illinois, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Gualandri & Co. v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Saltiel v. OlsenIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Amoco Realty Co. v. MontalbanoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. J.B. Esker & Sons, Inc. v. Cle-Pa's PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. North Shore Sign Co. v. Signature Design Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Sadler v. CreekmurAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. O'Brien & Associates, P.C. v. Tim Thompson, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. In re Marriage of PitullaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API