Legal Opinion

Doughty v. Hildt

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio

Decided December 15, 1838Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT. This action was brought against the indorser of a promissory note, which is admitted by the default of the defendant; and the judgment being entered by default, a motion is made to instruct the clerk, to include the cost of the protest in the taxation of costs. In the case of Union Bank v. Hyde, 6 Wheat. [19 U. S.] 572, the supreme court say, “The nullity of a protest on the legal obligations of the parties to an inland bill, is tested by the consideration, that independently of statutory provisions, if any exist any where, or conventional understanding, the protest on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morgan v. ReintzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1812

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API