Legal Opinion

Bain v. Howell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 7, 1946No. 8 Div. 340PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

An original bill was filed by some of the children and heirs at law of Charles Beard seeking to exercise the equity of redemption in respect to a mortgage made by Charles Beard to O. D. Street, now claimed by appellant W. N. Bain as remote assignee. The bill makes the widow and all the other heirs at law of Charles Beard parties respondent. It then sets up a transaction by Harriet Beard, the widow, as to her interest (sometimes referred to as a life interest in the land for a homestead), by which she sold it to one McCormick who is alleged to have agreed to pay and discharge…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Newbold v. SmartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Ohmer v. BoyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  4. McQueen v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. Lampkin v. StrawbridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Montgomery v. Drinkard Auto & Truck Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Nearhos v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Woods v. Allison Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Morgan Plan Company v. BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API