Herwick v. Stiehl
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph P. Sullivan, J.
This is an action by a depositor of two joint savings accounts against the codepositor and the depository banks to recover the proceeds of said accounts. The codepositors are mother and daughter. The mother sues naming the daughter as a party defendant because of the daughter’s assertion of a moiety interest in both bank accounts. Prior to the commencement of this lawsuit, the daughter placed a stop order against both bank accounts pursuant to section 675 of the Banking Law. It was this act which prompted the commencement of this lawsuit. The defendant banks have taken the position of a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In re the Estate of ReardonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966
- Scanlan v. MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Stevens v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Stevens v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dorsey v. ShortWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
- Davidson v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Schindler v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1980