United States v. George Ray
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
Defendant Ray was found guilty of transporting a stolen motor vehicle in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. He asserts a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel in that court-appointed counsel did not have sufficient time between his appointment and trial to locate a party from whom defendant claimed to have borrowed the transported automobile.
Admitting that the Sixth Amendment requires that counsel for an indigent defendant be appointed far enough in advance of trial to permit adequate preparation therefor, the Government argues that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- John E. Baldwin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- United States v. Cyrus T. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Mathis v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Curtis L. Braxton v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Peyton v. FieldsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.