Legal Opinion

United States v. George Ray

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 11, 1965No. 9969_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Ray was found guilty of transporting a stolen motor vehicle in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. He asserts a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel in that court-appointed counsel did not have sufficient time between his appointment and trial to locate a party from whom defendant claimed to have borrowed the transported automobile.

Admitting that the Sixth Amendment requires that counsel for an indigent defendant be appointed far enough in advance of trial to permit adequate preparation therefor, the Government argues that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. John E. Baldwin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. United States v. Cyrus T. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Mathis v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  4. Curtis L. Braxton v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  5. Peyton v. FieldsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API