Tickel v. Quinn
New York Surrogate's Court
This was a judicial settlement of executors’ accounts. Objections were filed on behalf of Maria Tickel and others, legatees under decedent’s will. The facts appear sufficiently in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Surrogate.
The executors having been called to an account by one of the legatees under the will of Edward H. Quinn, applied to have their account finally settled. Thereupon they filed separate accounts.
The testator, after making certain devises and bequests, gives and devises all the rest, residue and remainder of his real and personal estate to his executors in trust for the execution of his will, with power to sell the same at public or private sale, at such times, and upon such terms, and in such manner, as to them shall seem meet; provided, however, that no part of his said real estate…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Manice v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Savage v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Adair v. . BrimmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- White v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Ferrin v. . MyrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Beach's EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1892
- Young v. YoungNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- In re Gerow's EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1892