Green v. Blancett

The plaintiff and his wife sued his mother-in-law to have certain deeds formerly executed by them to her declared a mortgage. The judgment was for plaintiffs, 'and the defendant, in appealing, does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment.

Defendant’s first contention is that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of the plaintiff husband, citing the third’, paragraph of 12 Okla. St. Ann., sec. 385 (sec. 272, O. S. 1931), which makes the husband or wife incompetent to testify for or against each other, except in transactions in which one acts as the agent…