Legal Opinion
Garibay v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided February 18, 1983No. 6246Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Judge.
Defendants Roy Garibay and Lenora Am-ato 1 were convicted of promoting prostitution in the second degree in violation of AS 11.66.120(a).2 They subsequently filed this appeal, in which they jointly allege that numerous errors committed by the trial court require reversal of their conviction and a new trial. We affirm.
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Evidence produced at trial indicates that, on December 15,1980, Kelly Zavala answered a help-wanted ad placed in the Fairbanks Daily News Miner by the Paris Massage Parlor. She spoke with Amato, who explained to Zavala that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Irie E. Leonard, United States of America v. James L. SarvisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Gray v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- James H. Ellis, Jr. v. United States of America, Alfred M. Watkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- James v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.