Legal Opinion

DeKoning v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1995No. Docket 161155PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court granted plaintiffs motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(9) and (10), ruling that plaintiffs worldwide income was excluded from consideration in his Michigan farmland preservation property tax credit. We granted leave to appeal, and we reverse.

Plaintiff was a resident of the Netherlands who owned farmland in Michigan. In exchange for leaving some of this farmland undeveloped, plaintiff became eligible for a tax credit pursuant to the Farmland and Open Space Preservation Act, MCL 554.701 et seq.; MSA 26.1287(1) et seq. That act states, in relevant part:(1) An…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smeets v. Genesee County ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Great Lakes Sales, Inc v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Long v. Chelsea Community HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Rose Hill Center, Inc v. Holly TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Institute in Basic Life Principles, Inc. v. Watersmeet TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Inter Cooperative Council v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Golf Concepts v. City of Rochester HillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API