Legal Opinion

Yang v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 17, 2021No. 20-240Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-240C (Filed: September 17, 2021) ) NHIA TIMOTHY YANG, ) Attorneys’ fees; Equal Access to Justice ) Act; 28 U.S.C. § 2412; prevailing party; Plaintiff, ) some attorneys’ hours not reasonably ) expended v. ) ) UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Matthew Moore, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. With him on the briefs were Erin Brown Jones, Holly K. Victorson, and Diane E. Ghrist, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, D.C. Of counsel were Bart Stichman, Esther Leibfarth, Rochelle Bobroff, and David Sonenshine, National Veterans…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API