Mitchell v. Milner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion, by
STEPHENSON, C.
E. D. Mitchell and C. D. Jenal commenced their action against John T. Milner to recover for ’ unpaid rentals alleged to -be due the plaintiffs. The trial of ithe cause resulted in a judgment against the plaintiffs. The latter have appealed the cause to this court, and assign several of the proceedings had in the trial of the cause as error for reversal. Among 'the several propositions submitted ate: (1) The verdict of the jury is contrary to the evidence. (2) The verdict of the jury is contrary to law. (4) Error of the court in submitting the issues to the jury.
The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cutshall v. YatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Modern Woodmen of America v. BroskaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oskison v. BagbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Great Northern Life Ins. Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Bristow v. BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929