Legal Opinion

Ede v. Hahn

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1960No. Appeal, 58PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the counterclaim in the present action is res judicata.

On April 6, 1959 plaintiff, Francis H. S. Ede, assignee of Frederick F. Andrews and Rosemarie L. Andrews, brought an action in assumpsit against defendant, Clark Hahn. In the complaint it was averred that defendant Hahn brought an action of replevin, with bond, as of No. 78 April Term, 1949, against the Andrews, resulting in the delivery of an oil truck to Hahn; that a judgment was entered against Hahn in the amount of $2,500.00, which judgment was affirmed by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallace's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Thal v. KRAWITZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Larsen v. LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Pilgrim Food Products Co. v. Filler Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chianese v. Heintz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1964
  2. Petrasko v. Fellin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API